Feeling that he had been cheated, gore brought suit in alabama state court against bmw of north america on the grounds that its failure to disclose that the car was repainted.
49+ Gore V Bmw
PNG. Certiorari to the supreme court of alabama. Bmw of north america, inc.
Practical Application Of Bmw V Gore And State Farm V Campbell from img.yumpu.com
Gore's case went to trial, the jury in a similar lawsuit filed by another alabama bmw purchaser found that bmw's failure to. Iragore boughta black bmw sedan in january1990 from an authorizedbmw dealer in birmingham,ala. The supreme court held that a punitive damage award of five hundred times the amount of actual damages was grossly excessive and therefore contrary to the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.
Gore (the plaintiff at trial) was an alabama doctor who bought a bmw from a dealership there.
He sued bmw's american distributor (bmw), alleging that it committed fraud by failing to inform him that his car had been repainted. He is suing for $4000 in compensatory damages based on the testimony of bmw dealer, and $4 million in punitive damages based on the 983 refinished cars. In bmw of north america v. In bmw v gore, it began in 1990 when gore had purchased a black two door bmw from an alabama franchise of bmw of north america which happens to be the plaintiff.
